<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;PHP Eats Rails for Breakfast&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://zmievski.org/2006/10/php-eats-rails-for-breakfast/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gravitonic.com/2006/10/php-eats-rails-for-breakfast</link>
	<description>Life, technology, and other good things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 14:52:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: michael schurter</title>
		<link>http://zmievski.org/2006/10/php-eats-rails-for-breakfast/comment-page-1#comment-556</link>
		<dc:creator>michael schurter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 00:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravitonic.com/n/?p=195#comment-556</guid>
		<description>Sorry. :)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry. <img src='http://zmievski.org/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrei</title>
		<link>http://zmievski.org/2006/10/php-eats-rails-for-breakfast/comment-page-1#comment-555</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 04:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravitonic.com/n/?p=195#comment-555</guid>
		<description>Michael,

I believe you are incorrectly attributing these conclusions to me. I merely related some of the text of the Ohloh article. If you read my last paragraph again, you will see that I question the LOC statistics myself. &quot;Does pure lines-of-code count give indication to the quality of said code? Of course not.&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael,</p>
<p>I believe you are incorrectly attributing these conclusions to me. I merely related some of the text of the Ohloh article. If you read my last paragraph again, you will see that I question the LOC statistics myself. &#8220;Does pure lines-of-code count give indication to the quality of said code? Of course not.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael schurter</title>
		<link>http://zmievski.org/2006/10/php-eats-rails-for-breakfast/comment-page-1#comment-554</link>
		<dc:creator>michael schurter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 03:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravitonic.com/n/?p=195#comment-554</guid>
		<description>I think you&#039;re using statistics of dubious accuracy to arrive at some incorrect conclusions.

Not only do LOC != quality, but LOC != maturity or popularity either.  LOC is one of the oldest and most meaningless code statistics ever collected.

About the only thing is useful for gauging is how verbose a language is.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re using statistics of dubious accuracy to arrive at some incorrect conclusions.</p>
<p>Not only do LOC != quality, but LOC != maturity or popularity either.  LOC is one of the oldest and most meaningless code statistics ever collected.</p>
<p>About the only thing is useful for gauging is how verbose a language is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
