<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Few Good Things</title>
	<atom:link href="http://zmievski.org/2005/10/a-few-good-things/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gravitonic.com/2005/10/a-few-good-things</link>
	<description>Life, technology, and other good things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 23:22:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrei</title>
		<link>http://zmievski.org/2005/10/a-few-good-things/comment-page-1#comment-467</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2005 00:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravitonic.com/n/?p=128#comment-467</guid>
		<description>Yes, but at least Vietnamese doesn&#039;t make you swallow your tongue while trying to pronounce words. :)

Swahili would be interesting indeed, although the thrust of this paper was on phonemic analysis, which deals only with sounds of the language rather than its grammar or semantics. What you mention about Swahili makes it a head-marking language, meaning that the syntactic relationship between the nuclei (head) of a phrase and its dependents is coded morphologically on the head, rather than the dependents. Many Native American languages are head-marking; consider a Lakhota sentence:

Na-wÃ­Äha-ya-x?Å³.
stem-3pl(undergoer)-2sg(actor)-hear
&#039;You heard them&#039;.

The whole phrase is a verb with markings. That&#039;s just one of the reasons I love linguistics..
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, but at least Vietnamese doesn&#8217;t make you swallow your tongue while trying to pronounce words. <img src='http://zmievski.org/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Swahili would be interesting indeed, although the thrust of this paper was on phonemic analysis, which deals only with sounds of the language rather than its grammar or semantics. What you mention about Swahili makes it a head-marking language, meaning that the syntactic relationship between the nuclei (head) of a phrase and its dependents is coded morphologically on the head, rather than the dependents. Many Native American languages are head-marking; consider a Lakhota sentence:</p>
<p>Na-wÃ­Äha-ya-x?Å³.<br />
stem-3pl(undergoer)-2sg(actor)-hear<br />
&#8216;You heard them&#8217;.</p>
<p>The whole phrase is a verb with markings. That&#8217;s just one of the reasons I love linguistics..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://zmievski.org/2005/10/a-few-good-things/comment-page-1#comment-466</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2005 00:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravitonic.com/n/?p=128#comment-466</guid>
		<description>It could be worse - you could have picked a tonal language like Vietnamese...

I&#039;ve always thought that Swahili would be interesting to learn - the use of prefixes instead of conjunctions for person and tense is a beautifully subtle and simple way of doing things.

I&#039;m sure I&#039;ll get to say it in person, but happy birthday, old man. ;)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It could be worse &#8211; you could have picked a tonal language like Vietnamese&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve always thought that Swahili would be interesting to learn &#8211; the use of prefixes instead of conjunctions for person and tense is a beautifully subtle and simple way of doing things.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;ll get to say it in person, but happy birthday, old man. <img src='http://zmievski.org/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

